Faison v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Norris v. Mitchell (1998), City of Virginia Beach v. Harris (2000)
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. California Bridge & Construction Co. · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Williams · Ward v. Charlton · Faison v. Hudson · Johnson v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“forums other than those designated by this chapter [§§ 8.01-257 to -267].”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a judgment is not final for the purposes of res judicata ... when it is being appealed or when the time limits fixed for perfecting the appeal have not expired.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In any actions to which this chapter applies except those actions enumerated in Category A [pursuant to § 8.01-261] where preferred venue is specified, one or more of the following counties or .cities shall be permissible forums, such forums being sometimes referred to as “Category B” in this title: 1. Wherein the defendant resides or has his principal place of employment.... 3. Wherein the defendant regularly conducts affairs or business activity... . 4. Wherein the cause of action, or any part thereof, arose. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.