Daughtrey v. Ashe’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Michael v. Shiley, Inc. (1995), Compaq Computer Corp. v. Lapray (2004)
8 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 71 N.C. App. 101 - Hall v. T. L. Kemp Jewelry, Inc. · Fensom v. Rabb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an affirmation merely of the value of the goods or a statement purporting to be merely the seller's opinion or commendation of the goods does not create a warranty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“any description of the goods which is made part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to that description.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“all of the statements of the seller [are part of the basis of the bargain] unless good reason is shown”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.