Land v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2007
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Green · Powers v. Andrews · Fogleman v. National Surety Co. · Ex Parte Liddon · McDuffie v. Faulk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well established in this state that the statutory right of redemption is neither property, nor the right of property; that it is not subject to levy or sale as such under execution and that it is a right or privilege personal to the debtor. This principle has been recognized in many decisions of this court and is now embraced in our statutory law. Section 743, Title 7, Code 1940; McDuffie v. Faulk, 214 Ala. 221 , 107 So. 61 ; Powers et al. v. Andrews, 84 Ala. 289 , 4 So. 263 . “The question as to whether or not those persons who are given the right to redeem under the terms of Sections 727 and 742, Title 7, Code of 1940, may be substituted .as parties complainant, where the original complainant dies after filing suit *to redeem from mortgage foreclosure sale, is not necessary to the decision of this case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Land v. Cooper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.