Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 Ala. 31 - Watt v. Combs

Watt v. Combs’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably 482 So. 2d 1176 - General Motors Corp. v. Edwards (1985), 336 So. 2d 1338 - Vines v. Plantation Motor Lodge (1976)

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

14019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Tuscaloosa v. Fair · City of Birmingham v. Hawkins · Aplin v. Dean · Alabama Power Co. v. Bass · Sanders v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * it is equally well settled in this jurisdiction that if one is guilty of negligence and this negligence concurred or coalesced with the negligence of another, and the two combine to produce a given result, each is liable for the damages, and the negligence of each will be deemed the proximate cause of the injury producing the damages. * * * ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The general rule is that it is no defense, in actions for injuries resulting from negligence, that the negligence of third persons contributed to cause the injury to the plaintiff if the negligence of the defendant was an efficient cause, without which the injury would not have occurred. Stated differently, where a defendant is guilty of negligence which causes an injury, and the plaintiff is free from negligence contributing thereto, the fact that the negligence of a third person also contributed does not relieve the defendant from liability for his negligence."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.