In Re Dow Corning Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 363
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Sumner v. Mata · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc. · United States v. Swift & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“obviate the need for remand in the event [the bankruptcy court is] reversed on appeal with regard to the scope and permissibility of the release and injunction provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is confined within the broad boundaries of traditional equitable relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.