Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 Conn. 203

Weeks v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 24, 1998

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1998-03-24

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2006

1 district · 4 state decisions

Relies on Peerless Insurance v. Nault · Weeks v. Kramer · Claveloux v. Downtown Racquet Club Associates

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*204Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶2After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

¶3The appeal is dismissed.

¶4 We granted the defendants’ petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; Weeks v. Kramer, 45 Conn. App. 319, 696 A.2d 361 (1997); limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court holding that the plaintiff could not enforce the restrictive covenant that had been created by the parties’ predecessor in title, Hudson Nut Products, Inc., and finding that it did not run with the land?” Weeks v. Kramer, 243 Conn. 917, 701 A.2d 339 (1997).

/244/conn/203 · .json · Public domain