Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 Conn. 929

State v. Bispham

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 28, 1998

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1998-04-28

Relies on State v. Bispham

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-04-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2011

16 state decisions

90199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 135 (AC 15820), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as constancy of accusation evidence, and that the defendant did not show prejudice from the admission of such evidence, despite the prosecutor’s closing argument that the written statement would be available for review in the jury room to support the complainant’s credibility?”
/244/conn/929 · .json · Public domain