Ostrom v. Edison’s Empirical Analysis
244 F. 228 · 1917
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1955
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Shaw · In the Matter of Albertn Moore an Infant by Next Friend · Ex parte Wisner · Galveston Ry Co v. Gonzales · Gumbel v. Pitkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In all cases of the removal of suits from the courts of a state to the District Court of the United States such removal shall he to the United States District Court in the division in which the county is situated from which the removal Is made; and the time within which the removal shall he perfected, in so fail? as it refers to or is regulated by the terms of United States courts, shall be deemed to refer to the terms of the United States District Oourt in such division.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.