Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.1d 535 - Masses Pub. Co. v. Patten

Masses Pub. Co. v. Patten’s Empirical Analysis

244 F. 535 · 1917

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1997

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

40191719201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Jackson · Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad · American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty · Legal Tender Cases Knox v. Lee Parker · Public Clearing House v. Coyne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• “If one stops short of urging upon others that it is their duty or their interest to resist the law, it seems to me one should not be held to have attempted to cause its violation. If that be not the test, I can see no escape from the conclusion that under this section every political agitation which can be shown to be apt to create a seditious temper is illegal. I am confident that, by such language, Congress had no such revolutionary purpose in view.’’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “One may not counsel or advise others to violate the law as it stands. Words are not only the keys of persuasion, but the triggers of action, and those which have no purport but to counsel the violation of law cannot by any latitude of interpretation be a part of that public opinion which is the final source of government in a democratic state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.