Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.1d 967 - Ex parte Montgomery

Ex parte Montgomery’s Empirical Analysis

244 F. 967 · 1917

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
November 1968
most recently cited

3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1968

3 district · 6 state decisions

40191719201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hyde v. United States · United States v. Kissel · Munsey v. Clough · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hyatt v. People ex rel. Corkran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the indictment here mentions specially but a single day, it also alleges a conspiracy claimed to have been hatched during two years preceding the indictment. Conspiracy is a continuando [ sic ] crime, and the rule is now well settled that the demanding state is not bound either upon the trial or in the extradition proceedings by the specific date laid. While the relator was not in the locus in quo during the period it is alleged the crime was committed, he was within the demanding state and in the presence of a coconspirator on an interstate train. The circumstances of the relator's presence in the demanding state during this period do not establish the impossibility of his participation in the conspiracy. The crime charged did not require his presence in the locus in quo. A conspiracy may be a continuing offense. Indeed, it has been held to be a purely continuous offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at other times before and after said date, and within two years of the day of the taking of this inquisition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.