Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 F.2d 21

Docket No. 13597.

Alabama Mills, Inc. v. Mitchell

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 2, 1957. Decided April 26, 1957.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-04-26

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1958

5 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on Mitchell v. Covington Mills, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Submitted on the brief by Messrs. Llewellyn C. Thomas, Washington, D.C., and W. Glen Harlan, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

Submitted on the brief by Asst. Atty. Gen. (George C. Doub, Messrs. Paul Sweeney and Arthus H. Fribourg, Attys., Dept. of Justice, and Miss Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol., U.S. Dept. of Labor, for appellee Secretary of Labor. Mr. Edward H. Hickey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, at the time record was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee Secretary of Labor.

Submitted on the brief by Messrs. Arthur J. Goldberg and David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., for appellee Textile Workers Union of America, CIO.

Submitted on the brief by Mr. John W. Cragun, Washington, D.C., for appellee National Association of Cotton Manufacturers, and certain other appellees.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The judgment is affirmed, Judge Washington dissenting. Each member of the court adheres to the view he expressed in Mitchell v. Covington Mills, Inc., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 165, 229 F.2d 506.

¶2

Affirmed.

/244/f2d/21 · .json · Public domain