Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.2d 537 - Philip Schechtman v. Louis E. Wolfson

Philip Schechtman v. Louis E. Wolfson’s Empirical Analysis

244 F.2d 537 · 1957

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2012 · most notably Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. (1970), Kahan v. Rosenstiel (1970)

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

1401957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Calvin R. Morgan v. Riverside Mills Company, C. A. Folk, T. I. Ward · Groesbeck v. Goldstein · Milgram v. Loew's, Inc. · Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there should be some check on derivative actions lest they be purely strike suits of great nuisance and no affirmative good, and hence it is ruled that the benefit to the corporation and the general body of shareholders must be substantial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The modern equity practice is to allow counsel fees to successful prosecutors of derivative suits although no judgment has been obtained if they show substantial benefit to the corporation through their efforts, * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.