Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.2d 562 - Holzer v. United States

Holzer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

244 F.2d 562 · 1957

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 1971
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1971

15 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

100195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Buder v. Becker · Pratt v. Stout · Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before the question which the plaintiffs seek to have us decide will be ripe for review on appeal, their action must be tried on the merits and determined by the District Court. See and compare, Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co., 8 Cir., 193 F.2d 975 , 978. Where a case turns upon a question of local law, the considered views of the trial judge are of importance. Buder v. Becker, 8 Cir., 185 F.2d 311 , 315.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.