Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.2d 703 - Simon v. United States

Simon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

244 F.2d 703 · 1957

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023 · most notably Leonhard v. United States (1980), Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board (1984)

40 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

25019571960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hobby v. Hodges · United States v. Glenn · United States v. Chicago Golf Club · Carpenter v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * [W] hen, as in the Federal Tort Claims Act, the sovereign, by statute creating a cause of action and consenting to be sued upon it, makes it clear that the consent of the United States to be sued in tort is conditioned upon the suit’s being filed within the time fixed in the Act and not otherwise, exact compliance with the terms of consent is a condition precedent to suit.””
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[generally speaking the time requirement prescribed by a statute granting the right to sue the United States or a state is construed as a condition or qualification of the right; such a provision is in other words jurisdictional rather than a mere statute of limitations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “enabling statute, evidencing a consent to be sued and fixing the time for suing[; it] is not a statute of limitation but a statute granting for a limited time the right of action afforded.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.