Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 F.2d 77

Docket No. 15987.

Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-05-17

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1960

6 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Rathbun v. United States · Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Ohio Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Superior Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Wesley West v. Federal Power Commission · Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-05-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Robert E. May, Washington, D.C., Joiner Cartwright, Herf M. Weinert, Beaumont, Tex., Martin A. Row, Leo J. Hoffman, Dallas, Tex., Omar L. Crook, May, Shannon & Morley, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

W. Russell Gorman, C. Louis Knight, Samuel W. Jensch, Attys., Federal Power Commission, Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Federal Power Commission, Washington, D.C., Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Federal Power Commission.

Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This cause came on to be heard on a petition for review of an order of the Federal Power Commission and was argued by counsel. Upon consideration whereof, and of the briefs filed by the parties, it is

¶2

Ordered and adjudged by this Court that the petition for review in this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed on the authority of Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 236 F.2d 819, certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 967, 77 S.Ct. 354, 1 L.Ed. 321.

¶3

Dismissed.

¶4

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge, dissents for the reasons set forth at length in his dissent, Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 236 F.2d 785 at page 793, and particularly Part II, Suspension Cases.

/244/f2d/77 · .json · Public domain