Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 F.2d 772

Docket No. 13585.

Reed v. Bulman

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 25, 1957.

Decided May 2, 1957.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-05-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1957

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Jeremiah Collins, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Sidney M. Goldstein, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Leo N. McGuire, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee. Messrs. Joseph D. Bulman and Samuel Z. Goldman, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and FAHY and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The question on appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in ordering that a fee awarded by the court to a guardian ad litem for a minor defendant should be paid from the estate of said minor in favor of whom judgment had been rendered in the litigation which gave rise to the apointment of the guardian ad litem. The alternative was for the District Court to order that the fee be paid by the unsuccessful plaintiffs. See section 13-105 D.C.Code 1951. We find no abuse of discretion in the order as made and it accordingly is

¶2

Affirmed.

/244/f2d/772 · .json · Public domain