Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 F.2d 782

Docket No. 13361.

Rusche v. Brownell

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 15, 1957.

Decided May 23, 1957.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-05-23

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1957-05-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1971

1 federal appellate ·

20195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. George Eric Rosden, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Mr. Samuel Z. Gordon, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. George B. Searls and *783Irwin A. Seibel, Attys., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellees.

¶3Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought under § 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), for the recovery of property vested by the Attorney General in 1950 and 1951 on his finding that it was enemy owned. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

¶6Affirmed.

/244/f2d/782 · .json · Public domain