Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.2d 854 - Hawkins v. United States

Hawkins v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

244 F.2d 854 · 1957

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2002

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

60195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hyde v. United States · Hyde v. United States · Rakes v. United States · Trout v. Cassco Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * -» * testimony of jurors should not be received to show matters which essentially inhere in the verdict itself.’ Hyde v. U. S., 225 U. S. 347 , 384, 32 S.Ct. 793, 808 , 56 L.Ed. 1114 ; Rakes v. U. S., 4 Cir., 169 F.2d 739, 745 .” Hawkins v. United States, 244 F.2d 854, 856 (4th Cir. 1957).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.