Leslie v. Inter-Tel’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 46 Cal. 4th 1035 - Hughes v. Pair (2009), Yamamoto
2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Issues raised in a brief which are not supported by argument are deemed abandoned.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff may present a prima facie case of an employer's liability for a supervisor's sexual harassment without demonstrating that the employer was otherwise at fault. The only distinction is that the United States Supreme Court refers to this form of respondeat superior as `vicarious liability' and California's intermediate appellate courts call it `strict liability.' [¶] The confusion may lie in courts' tendency to interchange the terms `vicarious liability' and 'strict liability' in the employment context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.