Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.3d 512 - Palazzolo v. Gorcyca

Palazzolo v. Gorcyca’s Empirical Analysis

244 F.3d 512 · 2001

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Thomas Clyde Bowling, Jr. v. Phillip Parker, Warden (2003), Hodge v. Hurley (2005)

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

250200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Williams v. Taylor · North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Brown v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction or acquitta4 and against multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he corpus delicti rule was to prevent a defendant's confession from being used to convict him of a crime that never transpired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.