Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 F.3d 807 - Murray v. Auslander

Murray v. Auslander’s Empirical Analysis

244 F.3d 807 · 2001

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
3
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Cooper v. Southern Co. (2004), Visa Check/mastermoney Antitrust Litigation v. Usa

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 6 state decisions

730200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. · Chandler v. City of Dallas · Holmes v. Continental Can Co. · Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[M]onetary relief predominates in (b)(2) class actions unless it is incidental to requested injunctive or declaratory relief.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and ... a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A class representative must possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members in order to be typical under Rule 23(a)(3).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.