Eisen v. Venulum Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The terms of the merger clause do not evince only a desire to have the parol evidence rule fully applied; the language states an intention of the parties to completely replace and 'supersede' any prior agreement[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under New York law, '[i]t is well established that a subsequent contract regarding the same matter will supersede the prior contract.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“New York law allows for a finding of unconscionability, in exceptional cases, even where there was no procedural unconscionability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.