Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 Ga. App. 79 - Haynes v. State

244 Ga. App. 79 - Haynes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lattarulo v. State · Williams v. State · Brock v. State · 174 Ga. App. 19 - Gibbs v. State · 205 Ga. App. 597 - Robinson v. Moonraker Associates, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Language that is appropriate when contained in an opinion by a reviewing court may be improper when embodied in a jury charge. We have frequently held that the language employed by a judge of a reviewing court in discussing a case, or in giving reasons for a decision, is not always appropriate for use by a trial judge in charging a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.