Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 GAAPP 795 - Davis v. Emmis Publishing Corp.

Davis v. Emmis Publishing Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hollowell v. Jove · 114 Ga. App. 367 - Cabaniss v. Hipsley · Moore v. Robinson · City of Roswell v. City of Atlanta · Mott v. Central Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any written or oral statement, writing, or petition made before or to a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, or any written or oral statement, writing, or petition made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[I]t is undisputed that Davis failed to file the verifications with his complaint and that the omission was raised by the defendants in their answer. It is also undisputed that Davis filed the verifications with his amended complaint more than ten days (approximately two months) after the failure to file was first brought to his attention. We are bound to follow the express language of the statute. Applying that language, Davis was not free to amend the complaint after the ten-day period for the remedy of such failure had already expired. Furthermore, the statute explicitly mandates that the claim “shall be stricken” if the verification is not filed timely. “ ‘Shall’ ordinarily denotes command and not permission.” Ring v. Williams. 8 Thus, the trial court erred in holding that Davis’ failure to verify his complaint as required by law was an amendable defect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`act in furtherance of the right of free speech or the right to petition government for a redress of grievances under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Georgia in connection with an issue of public interest or concern'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.