Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 Ga. App. 885 - Lombardo v. State

244 Ga. App. 885 - Lombardo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on England v. Newton · Nicholson v. State · Parrish v. Ault · 201 Ga. App. 577 - Harrison v. State · 225 Ga. App. 147 - Latham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as part of the 1992 amendments, the statutory language relied upon in Parrish to modify the limitations of OCGA § 42-8-34 (g) was removed. Moreover, the trial court’s jurisdiction over the probated portion of a sentence was expressly made subject to OCGA § 42-8-34 (g), which states that the court may modify or revoke a probation sentence “during the period of time originally prescribed for the probated sentence to run.” And the new statute clarified that the probationary period does not begin until completion of the confinement portion of the sentence. It thus seems clear that, following the 1992 amendments, the trial court no longer has the power to revoke a probation sentence that has not yet begun.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.