State v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably 585 So. 2d 660 - Willie v. State (1991), State v. Brown (2007)
69 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Edwards v. Arizona · Lego v. Twomey · Michigan v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘When a trial court conducts a full pretrial hearing on the admissibility of an extrajudicial statement by an accused, determines the statement was freely, voluntarily and knowingly given and admits the statement into evidence at the trial, the appellate court should accept that determination if it is supported by substantial competent evidence. [Citations omitted.]’ ” (quoting State v. Brown, 235 Kan. 688, 691 , 681 P.2d 1071 [1984]).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Walker · State v. William“‘“To render such a confession involuntary it is generally held that the promise must concern action to be taken by a public official, that the promised action must be such as would likely cause the accused to make a false statement to obtain the benefits of the promise and the promise must be made by a person whom the accused reasonably believed to have the power or authority to execute the same.’ ” State v. Norris, 244 Kan. 326, 335 , 768 P.2d 296 (1989) (quoting State v. Kanive, 221 Kan. 34, 37 , 558 P.2d 1075 [1976]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Baston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.