Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 Ky. 658 - Soper v. Foster

Soper v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 1956
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1956

22 state decisions

140193219401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Elliott v. Fowler · Carpenter v. Moorelock · Wyatt's Trustee v. Grider · Ford v. May · Luscher v. Julian's Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To protect him against the possibility of spoliation or waste, only the chancellor of a court of proper jurisdiction may dispose of an infant’s land through the agencies of a court. That power is not inherent. It is derived from the statutes, and its exercise is defined and limited by specific directions, which must be strictly observed. In a word, the court can dispose of an infant’s land only in strict accordance with the terms of the statutory laws. They are its sole and only power and single source of jurisdiction. These are fundamental and inexorable principles, expounded and maintained from the beginning of our jurisprudence. Vowles’ Heirs v. Buckman, 36 Ky. [6 Dana] 466; Elliott v. Fowler, 112 Ky. 376 , 65 S. W. 849, 855 , 23 Ky. Law Rep. 1676 ; Wyatt’s Trustee v. Grider, 158 Ky. 440 , 165 S. W. 420 ; Eversole v. Roberts, 239 Ky. 532 , 39 S. W. [2d] 986.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.