Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 N.C. 524

94 S.E.2d 479

State v. Dillahunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1956

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1956-09-26

Relies on State v. Warren

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-09-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1995

18 state decisions

8019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In a criminal action neither the husband nor the wife is competent to testify against the other. G.S. 8-57. The rule is subject to certain exceptions not material here. The prohibition extends to declarations made by one spouse not in the presence of the other. It is the duty of the presiding judge to exclude such evidence. Objection is not necessary. S. v. Warren, 236 N.C. 358, 72 S.E. 2d 763. The Attorney General concedes the State’s inability to distinguish between this and the Warren case and on its authority the assignment of error is sustained and a new trial ordered.

¶2 New trial.

Johnson, J., not sitting.
/244/nc/524 · .json · Public domain