Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 N.C. 528

94 S.E.2d 496

Tynes v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1956

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1956-09-26

Relies on Salley v. Fayetteville Coca-Cola Bottling Co. · Barnette v. Woody · Rigsbee v. Perkins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-09-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1971

13 state decisions

100195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 An assignment of error not supported by an exception is ineffectual. Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223. Here no exception appears in the entire case on appeal. Hence, there is no basis for the assignments of error appellant attempts to set forth; and no question of law is presented to this Court for decision. Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926. See Rules 19 (3) and 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 554, 558.

¶2 .The judgment, supported by pleadings, evidence and verdict, will not be disturbed.

¶3 Apart from the foregoing, inspection of the record discloses that the case was well and fairly tried in accordance with settled legal principles.

¶4 No error.

Johnson, J., not sitting.
/244/nc/528 · .json · Public domain