Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

244 N.C. 80

State v. Barham

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1956-05-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1957

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The defendant seriously contends that the State’s evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. A careful consideration of the evidence, however, leads us to the conclusion that it is sufficient, and we so hold. Consequently, the assignments of error, in our opinion, present no prejudicial error that would justify disturbing the verdict rendered below.

¶2No error.

Johnson, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
/244/nc/80 · .json · Public domain