244 N.C. App. 20 - Comstock v. Comstock’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 68 N.C. App. 752 - Fortis Corp. v. Northeast Forest Products · Balawejder v. Balawejder · 234 N.C. App. 173 - Rudder v. Rudder · 242 N.C. App. 236 - Thomas v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here ... the General Assembly includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that the legislative body acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The issuance and renewal of DVPOs, the means for enforcing them, and the penalties for their violation are governed by North Carolina's Domestic Violence Act, which is codified in Chapter 50B of the North Carolina General Statutes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he district court division of the General Court of Justice shall have original jurisdiction over actions instituted under ... Chapter [50B].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. Cole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.