State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably State v. Buchholz (1999), Delicious Foods Co. v. Millard Warehouse, Inc. (1993)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Mapp v. Ohio · Schmerber v. State of California · Rochin v. People of California · Breithaupt v. Abram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court, as the trier of fact, is the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony and other evidence. Moreover, in reviewing a trial court’s ruling on suppression of evidence, an appellate court does not reweigh or resolve conflicts in the evidence, but will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless those findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Martin, 243 Neb. 368 , 500 N.W.2d 512 (1993); State v. Bowen, 232 Neb. 725 , 442 N.W.2d 209 (1989); State v. Marco, 230 Neb. 355 , 432 N.W.2d 1 (1988). In deciding whether a trial court’s findings on a motion to suppress are clearly erroneous, an appellate court takes into consideration that the trial court has observed the witnesses testifying regarding such motion. State v. Martin, supra; State v. Ellington, 242 Neb. 554 , 495 N.W.2d 915 (1993); State v. Van Ackeren, 242 Neb. 479 , 495 N.W.2d 630 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.