Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 Neb. 607 - Sanwick v. Jenson

Sanwick v. Jenson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2013

14 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Interest of RR · C. C. Natvig's Sons, Inc. v. Summers · GFH Financial Services Corp. v. Kirk · Behm v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. · Gross v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is so clearly against the weight and reasonableness of the evidence and so disproportionate to the injury proved as to demonstrate that it was the result of passion, prejudice, mistake, or some other means not apparent in the record, or that the jury disregarded the evidence or rules of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.