Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 NJSUPER 357 - State v. Sullivan

State v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on United States v. Giordano · United States v. Chavez · Hulver v. United States · State v. Hunt · United States v. Ojeda Rios

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no reason to conclude that the Legislature intended to extend that sanction [suppression of evidence] beyond its usual role by excluding untainted evidence obtained after such a violation has been remedied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.