Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 Pa. Super. 113 - Commonwealth v. Parker

244 Pa. Super. 113 - Commonwealth v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably 248 Pa. Super. 552 - Commonwealth v. Holmes (1977), 250 Pa. Super. 116 - Commonwealth v. Jones (1977)

37 state decisions

2101976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Commonwealth v. Kates · Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle · 234 Pa. Super. 31 - Commonwealth v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, we have held that so long as a parolee has received a probable cause (i. e. Gagnon I hearing, it is permissible to postpone the Gagnon II hearing pending the trial of the charges upon which the parole revocation is based. Commonwealth v. Davis, 234 Pa.Super. 31 , 336 A.2d 616 (1975). We have also held that a preliminary hearing resulting in a parolee’s being held for court complies with the requirements of a Gagnon I hearing. Id. See also Commonwealth v. Spinozzi, 236 Pa.Super. 32 , 345 A.2d 181 (1975); Commonwealth v. Ball, 235 Pa.Super. 581 , 344 A.2d 675 (1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whenever a defendant has been placed on probation or parole, the judge shall not revoke such probation or parole as allowed by law unless there has been a hearing held as speedily as possible at which the defendant is present and represented by counsel and there has been a finding of record that the defendant violated a condition of probation or parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is nothing more than a restatement of the doctrine developed by our courts that a revocation hearing must be held with reasonable promptness after probation officials know or reasonably should have known of the violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.