Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 S.C. 365 - Adams v. Duffie

Adams v. Duffie’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1980

5 state decisions

40196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on MacK v. Frito-Lay, Inc. · Lee v. Kirby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is clear that the order granting a new trial was based upon a consideration of the evidence and a conclusion therefrom by the trial judge, contrary to that of the jury. It is well settled in this state that the trial judge has the authority and responsibility to. grant a new trial when, in his judgment, the verdict of the jury is contrary to the fair preponderance of the evidence and that an order granting a new trial on such ground is not appealable. Lee v. Kirby, 243 S. C. 185, 133 S. E. (2d) 127 ; Mack v. Frito-Lay et al., 243 S. C. 376, 133 S. E. (2d) 833 .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.