Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 So. 3d 44 - In re Benoit

244 So. 3d 44 - In re Benoit’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 714 So. 2d 1226 - LeBreton v. Rabito · 998 So. 2d 16 - MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. · Younger v. Marshall Industries, Inc. · Tranum v. Hebert · Borel v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court conclusively established in LeBreton v. Rabito , 1997-2221, p. 9 (La. 7/8/98), 714 So.2d 1226 , 1230, that the LMMA [Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act] applies to the exclusion of the general codal provisions found in our Louisiana Civil Code in determining the suspension or interruption of prescription in medical malpractice actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “all joint and solidary obligors, and all joint tortfeasors, including but not limited to health care providers, both qualified and not qualified[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in all events such claims shall be filed at the latest within a period of three years from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.