Lancaster v. Magrill’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1968
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hines v. Walker · 13 Tex. Civ. App. 185 - Tyler Southeastern Railway Co. v. Rasberry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The testimony was not subject to the objection that it was hearsay. There was no better method of determining what Magrill’s intentions were regarding his son than the declarations made by him prior to his death.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. Riedel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.