Kuenz v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(A) identify the trial court ruling or action that the appellant challenges; (B) state concisely the legal reasons for the appellant's claim of reversible error; and (C) explain in summary fashion why, in the context of the ease, those legal reasons support the claim of reversible error.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lauck v. Price · Hamilton v. Archer

2. “an immediate, accurate, complete and unbiased understanding of the facts of the case”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hubbard v. Schaefer Autobody Ctrs., Inc. · Hamilton v. Archer

3. “Failure to conform with the mandates of Rule 84.04 results in unpre-served allegations of error and can constitute grounds for the dismissal of an appeal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lauck v. Price