Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 U.S. 100 - E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. Masland

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. Masland’s Empirical Analysis

244 U.S. 100 · 1917

Citation profile

439
cited by 439 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

100 federal appellate · 50 district · 132 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 439 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. (1984), Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp. (1974)

100 federal appellate · 50 district · 132 state decisions — followed in 21 states

97019171920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMasland v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Masland v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. · E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co. v. Masland · E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. Masland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 439 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The word `property' as applied to trademarks and trade-secrets is an unanalyzed expression of certain secondary consequences of the primary fact that the law makes some rudimentary requirements of good faith. Whether the plaintiffs have any valuable secret or not the defendant knows the facts, whatever they are, through a special confidence that he accepted. The property may be denied but the confidence cannot be.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It will be understood that if, in the opinion of the trial judge, it is or should become necessary to reveal the secrets to others, it will rest in the judge's discretion to determine whether, to whom, and under what precautions, the revelation should be made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.