Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 244 U.S. 305 - Emma F. Doepel v. Luttie B. Jones

Emma F. Doepel v. Luttie B. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

244 U.S. 305 · 1917

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 1919
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It seems superfluous to reason to demonstrate that no equitable right to hold the patentee as a trustee could possibly arise in favor of the plaintiffs in error, since the application to enter upon which they rely was in legal contemplation nonexistent, and hence could afford no basis for equitable rights of any character.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.