Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
244 U.S. 49 · 1917
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 25 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently November 1995 · most notably Baldwin v. Ionwa State Traveling Men's Ass'n (1931), United States v. De Ortiz (1990)
29 federal appellate · 25 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on St Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas v. Robert Alexander · McLish v. Roff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“settled that the right to review ... a question of jurisdiction may not be availed of until after final judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fulmer v. Bullard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.