Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Ala. 156 - Blaum v. May

Blaum v. May’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2001

8 state decisions

401944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Copeland v. McAdory · Mygatt v. . Coe · Patterson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. · MacMahon v. Baumhauer · Prestwood v. McGowin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not sufficient that the covenant is concerning land, but to make it run with the land there must be a privity of estate between the covenanting parties, and the covenant must have relation to an interest created or conveyed, in order that the covenant may pass to the grantee of the covenantee. In order to entitle one to recover on a covenant of warranty of a remote vendor, the plaintiff must show that he holds title by privity with the immediate covenantor of such remote vendor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.