Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Ala. 159 - Jenkins v. State

Jenkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1979

14 state decisions

601944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dyer v. State · Vaughn v. State · Smith v. State · Shepherd v. Clements · Dillon v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The appellant, Ben Jenkins, was indicted by a grand jury organized in the Jefferson County Circuit Court, for a capital felony. He was duly tried and convicted of this offense by a jury drawn, summoned and organized as provided by Subdivision 5, Tit. 62, of the Code of 1940, which embraces Section 196 to Section 228, inclusive— a codification of the law enacted and operating in Jefferson County prior to the adoption of the code — the dominant purpose of which, as appears from its provisions, was to provide secret venires for use in the courts of that county for the trial of all cases ‘whether civil or criminal, capital or otherwise,’ Code 1940, Tit. 62, § 213, as a safeguard against the supposed pernicious evil of tampering with or fixing jurors for the trial of cases, before the juries are organized and come under the immediate protection of the court. This jury law has been upheld as constitutional by this court. Morris v. State, 234 Ala. 520 , 175 So. 283 ; Vaughn v. State, 236 Ala. 442 , 183 So. 428 ; Dyer v. State, 241 Ala. 679 , 4 So.2d 311 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the several chapters, titles, and sections of the Code of Alabama are in pari materia, each having a field of operation and must be so construed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Code as a whole provides a system of law applicable to the [whole] state,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.