Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Ala. 241 - Almon v. Morgan County

Almon v. Morgan County’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably State Tenure Commission v. Madison County Board of Education (1968), Vernon v. State (1944)

55 state decisions

18019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Morgan v. United States · Rochester Telephone Corporation v. United States · John Den James Murray and John Kayser v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement Company John Den James B Murray et al. · Japanese Immigrant Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Legislature prescribes the State's policy; the courts do not”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] statute may be enacted without containing [a] provision for constitutional requirements but in such terms as not to exclude them and to justify the court in holding that it was intended to be subject to those requirements, which should then be treated as a feature of it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Procedural due process, broadly speaking, contemplates the rudimentary requirements of fair play . . . which include a fair and open hearing before a legally constituted court or other authority, with notice and opportunity to present evidence and argument; representation by counsel if desired; and information as to the claims of the opposing party, with reasonable opportunity to controvert them." (Citations omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.