Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Ala. 689 - Randolph v. Randolph

Randolph v. Randolph’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently February 2004 · most notably City of Huntsville v. Miller (1958), Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc. (1957)

55 state decisions

2701944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's Heirs · Puckett v. Puckett · Dunn v. Ponceler · Davidson v. Brown · Griswold v. Griswold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It may be correctly said, that the maxim, that equity follows the law, is a maxim liable to many exceptions; and that it cannot be generally affirmed, that where there is no remedy at law in the given case, there is none in equity; or, on the other hand, that equity in the administration of its own principles, is utterly regardless of the law. * * * "`Fraud is defined by the civilians to be any artifice or deception used to cheat, or deceive. This definition would however seem to embrace only actual or positive frauds. But fraud, as understood and denounced in equity, includes all acts, omissions, or concealments which involve a breach of a legal or equitable duty, trust or confidence justly reposed, which are injurious to another, or by which an undue or unconscientious advantage is taken of another. And Courts of equity will not only interfere in cases of fraud, to set aside acts done; but will also if by fraud, acts have been prevented from being done by the parties, interfere and treat the case precisely as if the acts had been done. * * *'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.