Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 ARK 251 - Pennington v. Oliver

Pennington v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1974
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faucette v. Gerlach · McClendon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A person who enters into an office and undertakes the performance of the duties thereof by virtue of an election or appointment, is an officer de jado, though he was ineligible at the time he was elected or appointed, or has subsequently become disabled to hold the office. Indeed, it is settled by a current of authority almost unbroken for over 500 years in England and this country, that ineligibility to hold an office does not prevent the ineligible incumbent, if in possession under color of right and authority, from being an officer de facto with respect to his official acts, in so far as third persons are concerned.'””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.