People v. Appleton’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
31 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 481 - People v. Lent · 134 S. Ct. 2473 - Riley v. Cal. United States · 43 Cal. 3d 600 - People v. Bravo · People v. Sheena K. · People v. Olguin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A probation condition that imposes limitations on a person's constitutional rights must closely tailor those limitations to the purpose of the condition to avoid being invalidated as constitutionally overbroad.' [Citation.] 'The essential question in an overbreadth challenge is the closeness of the fit between the legitimate purpose of the restriction and the burden it imposes on the defendant's constitutional rights-bearing in mind, of course, that perfection in such matters is impossible, and that practical necessity will justify some infringement.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although [the majority of the cases from the First District] concerned juveniles, we generally agree with their reasoning related to computer search conditions. Like the conditions at issue in those cases, the probation condition here would allow for searches of vast amounts of personal information unrelated to defendant's criminal conduct or his potential for future criminality. Furthermore, the state's interest here-monitoring whether defendant uses social media to contact minors for unlawful purposes-could be served through narrower means.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“constitutional challenges to probation conditions de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.