Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 CALRPTR3D 387 - People v. Weir

People v. Weir’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · 32 Cal. 4th 1266 - People v. Canty · 2 Cal. 5th 858 - People v. Gonzales · 2 Cal. 5th 903 - People v. Romanowski · 3 Cal. 5th 1175 - People v. Page

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Soto , the court refused to reclassify theft from an elder victim ( [Pen. Code,] § 368, subd. (d) ) under [Penal Code] section 490.2 because it was a 'theft-plus' offense that required the additional necessary elements that the victim be an elder or dependent adult and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that fact. ( Soto , at pp. 823-824, 233 Cal.Rptr.3d 515 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “section 490.2 does not automatically extend to 'any course of conduct that happens to include obtaining property by theft worth less than $950. ' ( Soto , at p. 823, 233 Cal.Rptr.3d 515 [.] )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “addressed the ineligibility of aggravated forms of theft for reclassification under Proposition 47.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.