Richard v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
245 F. 330 · 1917
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 1919
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Noble · Maharry v. Eatman · Hope v. Foley · United States v. Knight · Harris v. Gale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the death of any allottee . . . shall operate to remove all restrictions upon the alienation of said allottee’s land: Provided, That ho conveyance of any interest of any full-blood Indian heir in such land shall be valid unless approved by the court having jurisdiction of the settlement of the estate of said deceased allottee,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. Richard“leases of restricted lands for oil, gas or other mining purposes . . . may be made, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, under rules and regulations provided by the Secretary of the Interior, and not otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parker v. Richard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.